A Muslim should not be restricted in his religious rulings to a specific jurisprudence, but rather should rely on the authenticity of the hadiths, as some scholars have said: (If the hadith is authentic, then it is my school of thought). There are matters that may fall under the category of restriction even though there is a concession based on hadiths reported from the Prophet, peace be upon him. An example of this is: the third lesson on the topic of women's purity by Dr. Muadh Hawwa, where the hadith he cited in this regard is considered weak by most scholars, and Dr. Muadh's reasoning contradicts what was reported from the Prophet, peace be upon him, and what our mother Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, mentioned in this context: 1. The Prophet, peace be upon him, used to remember Allah, the Exalted, in all his states, and the Quran is also a form of remembrance. 2. When the Prophet, peace be upon him, commanded Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, during the pilgrimage while she was menstruating to do everything that a pilgrim does, except to circumambulate the Kaaba and pray; isn't remembering and reciting the Quran something that a pilgrim does? 3. When the Prophet, peace be upon him, clarified that a Muslim does not become impure; how can we prevent a menstruating woman from reciting the Quran? Even though a believer does not become impure. 4. The verse: (None touch it except the purified) refers to: the preserved tablet, and they are the purified angels, not humans. From here, my brother, opinions and disagreements begin, and the principle is to mention the hadiths, their authenticity, and clarify the scholars' opinions on the authenticity of the hadith; so that a person can be completely confident in what he receives from his teachers.